SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 233

S.D.PANDIT
Kanaiyalal Arjandas – Appellant
Versus
Tribhovandas Devsibhai Pandit – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.N.JHALA, P.M.RAVAL, S.R.DIVETIA

S. D. PANDIT, J.

( 1 ) KANAIYALAL Arjandas-original complainant in Criminal case No. 8219 of 1984 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narol has preferred the present revision Application against the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, ahmedabad (Rural) at Narol passed on 17th September, 1985 in Criminal Appeal No. 55 of 1985. Neither Revision Applicant nor the applicants advocate is present, but as this revision Application is admitted and as the record and proceedings is on record, I proceed to decide this Revision Application on merits after perusing the record and after hearing the learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Divetia supporting the Revision applicant.

( 2 ) THE respondent No. 1 was charge-sheeted by the police of Narol police station on the allegation that on 19. 11. 1984, at about 12. 45 p. m. , he drove his truck No. GTC 2265 at Kubernagar, "g" ward near Radhaswami Auto centre in rash and negligent manner and caused death of Kishorbhai. a boy aged about 15 years. The learned Magistrate at Narol had framed charge against the accused for the offence punishable under Secs. 304-A and 279 of,the Indian Penal Code. The respondent No. 1 accuse










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top