SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 216

M.S.PARIKH
PARASRAN LALURAM MAWAR – Appellant
Versus
INDRAVADAN NATWARLAL SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.ARYAMA SUNDARAM, M.J.PARIKH, P.B.MAJUMDAR, SURESH M.SHAH

M. S. PARIKH, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Service of Rule waived by Mr. P. B. Majmudar, learned Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

( 2 ) HEARD. Both these revisions seek to challenge the judgment and order dated 2-4-1977 rendered by the learned Judges of the Appellate Bench of the Small causes Court at Ahmedabad in Appeal From Order No. 43 of 1997 and Appeal from Order No. 44 of 1997.

( 3 ) THE petitioner herein was the original tenant of the suit premises against whom and against the sub-tenants\unlawful assignees, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed H. R. P. Suit No. 1975 of 1977 for obtaining possession of the suit premises. Before that the landlord filed H. R. P. Suit No. 4805 of 1974 on 17-10-1974 for obtaining injunction. This was followed by H. R. P. Suit No. 5203 of 1974 filed on 5-11-1974, which was ultimately withdrawn contending that on 6-5-1977 aforesaid substantial suit for possession, viz. , H. R. P. Suit No. 1975 of 1977 was filed. In the said suit the present petitioner being the 1st defendant was served by substituted service. However, the suit was contested by the other defendants being the subtenants/ unlawful assignees. Ultimately, decree for possession was passed on 24-2- 1




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top