SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 215

M.R.CALLA
VASANTIKA R. DALIA – Appellant
Versus
BARODA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.S.SUPEHIA, I.S.SUPEHIA, PRANAV G.DESAI

M. R. CALLA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned Counsel. The petitioner was employed with Baroda Municipal Corporation on 7-7-1975 as Stenographer and her services were terminated in January/february, 1997 without following requirements of S. 25f of the Industrial Disputes Act. Of course, in the meantime for a short period of three months by an order dated 14-10-1977 she had been given an employment as Typist. However, the petitioner had raised a dispute about her unlawful termination in January/february, 1977 from the post of stenographer. This dispute was referred to the Labour Court, Baroda. On 28-3-1988 in Reference (L. C. A.) No. 14 of 1980, the Labour Court, Baroda granted relief of reinstatement in favour of the petitioner without any back wages whatsoever. Against this award dated 28-3-1988, Baroda Municipal Corporation preferred Special Civil application No. 3483 of 1988 contesting the relief of reinstatement as was granted by the Labour Court but this petition failed. While rejecting the Corporations petition summarily the Division Bench observed that "in February, 1977 when the respondent was terminated from service as Stenographer provision of S. 25f was violated by the petitioner-C





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top