N.J.PANDYA
MITESHCHANDRA MANILAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) IN all these petitions, the question involved is revolving around the events that took place in Dakor Court, District Kheda. It was reported in newspaper and later on substantiated that in the said Court, warrants are being issued against anyone and everyone, just for asking and all that has to be done is to file a complaint of whatsoever nature.
( 2 ) THE events involving the Presiding Officer of Dakor Court is referred to in the aforesaid brief manner because, as a fall out of what happened in Dakor Court, there came to be filed a complaint against persons involved in some of the complaints in different police stations alleging offences under Secs. 120b, 181, 182, 205, 211, 465, 468 and 469 all of Indian Penal Code. In first of the aforesaid matters, namely, cri. M. A. No. 5722 of 1994, a complaint came to be registered for the aforesaid offences at Dakor Police Station, as Crime Register No. I 211 of 1994. The offence was registered under the instructions of the Senior Police Sub-Inspector of Dakor and an intimation to that effect was sent to Dakor Court. Later on, the learned magistrate of the Court was informed that, during investigation offence under Sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.