SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 499

M.R.CALLA
Prashant Jayantilal Patel – Appellant
Versus
Sub Registrar Ahmedabad-2 – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.C.BHATT

M. R. CALLA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners have come with a case that they have purchased certain land from Respondents Nos. 2 to 7 and they have already paid full consideration in respect of this land situated in village Gota, Survey No. 400. In respect of this, sale document no. 6165 dated 30. 12. 1996 was submitted for registration before the sub-Registrar, Ahmedabad-2 (wadaj ). The grievance of the petitioners is that this document is not being registered by the Sub-Registrar. The petitioners have stated that respondents No. 2 to 7 intended to back out from the transaction. The petitioners had approached the Land Revenue Authority for mutating their names as owners and occupiers in the government record. It is also the case of the petitioners that the village accountant posted Entry No. 2342 dated 19. 1. 1997 to mutate the petitioners names as owners and occupiers of this land. It is also stated that the entry was certified by certifying officer on 29. 4. 1997. It is then stated that the Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 preferred Appeal no. 111/97 before the Dy. Collector against Entry No. 2342 dated 19. 1. 1997 but the Dy. Collector decided the matter in favour of Respondent Nos. 2 to 7. The






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top