SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 493

H.R.SHELAT
BHIKHABHAI UDESINH DARBAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.N.Patel, V.D.PARGHI

H. R. SHELAT, J.

( 1 ) ). Rule. Mr. D. N. Patel, learned A. P. P. waives the service of Rule. At the request of both, the application is heard today.

( 2 ) ). The applicant prays for necessary modification in the order of bail granted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Misc. Criminal application No. 625 of 1997.

( 3 ) ). It is not necessary to set out the details of the case, yet in short, the facts leading the applicant to file this application be delineated. On being arrested during the course of investigation after the F. I. R. of the offences under Secs. 363 and 366 i. P. Code came to be filed before the police station at Petlad, the applicant filed misc. Criminal Application No. 625 of 1997 before the Sessions Court, Kheda at nadiad for bail. It was transferred to the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, kheda at Nadiad for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. The learned Judge of that Court hearing the parties allowed the application, and released the applicant on bail on his executing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000. 00 and also imposed certain conditions. Under one of the conditions the petitioner is directed to deposit nonrefundable amount







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top