SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 535

S.D.PANDIT
ANIL G. SHAH – Appellant
Versus
J. CHITTRANJAN COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.R.Gajjar, S.P.HASURKAR, S.V.RAJU

S. D. PANDIT, J.

( 1 ) ). The original complainant in Criminal Case No. 2203 of 1994 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 9, Ahmedabad has filed the present Revision Application to challenge the order passed by the learned additional City Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad in Criminal Revision Application No. 296 of 1996 on 7th July, 1997.

( 2 ) ). Revision Applicant Anil G. Shah is the son of late G. L. Shah and he was also a power of attorney holder of G. L. Shah when he filed Criminal Case No. 2203 of 1994 against the respondent for the alleged offence punishable under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (For short "the Act" ). The said Criminal case No. 2203 of 1994 was filed on 7th July, 1994 and the description of the complainant in the complaint is given as under : "g. L. Shah, through authorised representative and constituted attorney Anil G. Shah, "sanskrut", 2nd Floor, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad. " from the above description of the said complainant, it is quite clear that the complaint is lodged by the said G. L. Shah and the said complaint was filed and signed by his power of attorney holder, namely, Anil G. Shah. It was the allegation of the compla


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top