SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 413

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :J.M.Panchal, M.H.Kadri
KOLI RAMSING GANDABHAI - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL 159 of 1995
Decided On : 09/02/1997

Advocates Appeared: K.P.RAVAL, P.M.VYAS

Headnote:(a) Penal Code, 1860 - Secs. 302 & 201 - Appeal against conviction - Allegations that the appellant strangulated his wife and threw the dead body into a well - No eye witness or direct evidence - Only there is an extra-judicial confession - This confession does not state the actual words, or the place and time of its making - In Court the witness did not depose clearly about this confession - Such statement is not reliable.

       A bare reading of the deposition of witness Shivabhai makes it abundantly clear that he has given complete go-by to what is stated by him in his complaint and omitted to state the relevant facts before Court. As witness Shivabhai Becharbhai has not given material particulars about extra-judicial confession alleged to have been made by the appellant before him, we do not think it safe to rely on the said evidence for the purpose of basing conviction of the appellant on murder charge.

       [Para 8]

       (b) Evidence Act, 1872 - Sec. 27 - Statement by the accused leading to the discovery of a fact is admissible - The other portions of such a statement are not to be admitted in evidence - In the present case the appellant-accused pointed out the place where he strangulated his wife - Such information does not leads to discovery of a fact - This is of no help to the prosecution.

       It hardly needs to be stated that essential ingredient of Sec. 27 is that the information given by the accused must lead to the discovery of the fact which is the direct outcome of such information and only such portion of the information given as is distinctly connected with the said discovery is admissible against accused, but confessional statement made by the accused and allegedly recorded in the panchnama prepared under Sec. 27 of the Evidence Act cannot be relied on for the purpose of basing conviction.

       [Para 8]

( 1 ) BY means of filing this appeal under S. 374 (2) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the appellant has challenged legality and propriety of judgment and order dated February 15, 1995 rendered by the learned sessions Judge, Surendranagar, in Sessions Case No. 9 of 1994 by which he is convicted under Secs. 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R. I. for life as well as fine of Rs. 500. 00 in default R. I. for three months. It may be mentioned that though the appellant is convicted under S. 201 of the indian Penal Code, no separate sentence is imposed on the appellant by the learned Judge for the said offence.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case as emerging from F. I. R. lodged by witness Shivabhai is as under : Shivabhai Becharbhai is a resident of village Dhanad, Taluka : Halvad, district : Surendranagar. His daughter Godavariben was married to the appellant 20 years back and was residing with the appellant initially at village Kavadia. At the said village the appellant and Godavariben stayed for about 10 years, but thereafter moved to village Balva-Unava, Taluka : Kalol in search of work. The appellant used to treat his wife Godavariben cruelly, as he was suspecting her chastity. After staying about two years at village Balva-Unava, the appellant with his wife Godavariben came to reside at the Wadi of one Rehmanbhai Chandbhai situated in the sim of village Halvad. Both of them were doing labour work at the wadi of one Patel Arjanbhai Bhagwanjibhai. As the appellant was subjecting his wife Godavari to cruelty, Godavari had come to reside with her parents at village dhanad, but ultimately, she was persuaded to reside with the appellant. Four days prior to September 26, 1993, the appellant came to village Dhanad and informed his father-in-law Shivabhai Becharbhai that Godavari had left his house on the pretext of attending fair arranged at village Tarnetar and was missing since Pancham (fifth day of lunar fortnight ). On hearing this, Shivabhai Becharbhai went to Wadi of Patel arjanbhai Bhagwanjibhai, who informed Shivabhai that on September 19, 1993 he had given ornaments and some cash amount to Godavari, as she had expressed desire to attend fair at village Tarnetar. Patel Arjanbhai Bhagwanjibhai made inquiry about godavari at village Sajjanpur where Soma Vershi, brother of Shivabhai is residing, without any avail. Inquiry made by other relatives of Shivabhai also did not yield any result. On September 25, 1993 at about 9-00 p. m. Shivabhai again went to Wadi of Patel Arjanbhai Bhagwanji where he met his son-in-law, i. e. , appellant. At about 11-30 p. m. the appellant informed Shivabhai that he would be able to trace his daughter either dead or alive soon. When Shivabhai made inquiries with the appellant as to why he was saying so, the appellant informed that when he was proceeding to village Dhanad on September 22, 1993 in a rickshaw, he met Godavari at village malaniyad, who had alighted from a bus, but she did not give proper reply when he asked her as to where she had gone and therefore, he was annoyed and coaxed godavari to come to field of Bharvad Dhana Ramu situated in the sim of village mangalpur where he strangulated her and threw her dead body in an unused well situated in the field. The appellant asked Shivabhai not to inform anyone about the incident and threatened him with dire consequences. Because of threat administered by the appellant, Shivabhai did not narrate the confession made by the appellant to any one else. Meanwhile Mr. C. P. Sisodiya, who was then discharging duties as P. S. I. , Halvad police Station, received wireless message from Mr. Manilal, P. S. O. of Halvad Police station that a dead body was found floating in the well situated in the field of Dhana ramu Bharwad. Therefore, the P. S. I. went to the field and fished out the dead body from the well. The police officer thereafter held inquest on dead body in presence of Mamlatdar. At the time of holding inquest, Koli Virabh













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top