SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 412

M.S.SHAH
J. M. S. LABS – Appellant
Versus
YUSUFALI EESMAIL HADVAID – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.M.THAKKAR, R.R.SHAH

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal challenges the ex-parte ad-interim injunction dated august 19, 1997 granted by the learned Extra Assistant Judge, Gondal restraining the appellant-defendant from using the trade mark labels/artistic works of J. M. S. and/ or NEW J. M. S. LAL LEP as per Annexure-B (colly.) to the interim injunction application on pouch/packet, carton/box and pamphlet having identical and deceptively similar art works, designs, get-up, lay-out, placement of features in identical colour scheme with the identical name, LAL LEP or any other identical or deceptively similar trade mark labels/artistic works to the plaintiffs trade mark labels/artistic work of LAL LEP as per Annexure-A (colly.) to the interim injunction application and thereby passing off or enabling others to pass off their Ayurvedic preparation used for bone-setting and also from infringing the copyrights and trade mark rights of the plaintiff in any manner.

( 2 ) MR. Shah, learned Counsel for the appellant-defendant submitted that the trial court ought not to have granted ex-parte injunction in view of the provisions of order under Order 39, Rule 3 C. P. C. The reasons given by the trial Court for grantin

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top