SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 466

N.N.MATHUR, R.A.MEHTA
ADDITION ADVERTISING – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AVANI MEHTA, HARUBHAI MEHTA, P.R.NANAVATI

R. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) ). The petitioner, an advertising agency challenges the vires of the provisions of Secs. 65 (16) (d) and 66 (2) of Chapter V of Finance act, 1994 as amended. By these provisions, a service tax is imposed on advertising service. The challenge is based upon Art. 14, 19 (1) (a) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) ). S. 65 (16) (d) defines "taxable service" to mean. . . any service provided to a client by an advertising agency in relation to advertisements in any manner. Section 66 is the charging section which provides that there shall be charged a service tax at the rate of 5% of the value of the taxable service. Section 67 provides for valuation of taxable service for charging the service tax and clause (d) provides that in relation to service provided by an advertising agency to a client, the gross amount charged by such agency from the client shall be for services in relation to the advertising.

( 3 ) ). It is submitted that advertising service is a skill of expression and there is a fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by Art. 19 (1) of the Constitution and, therefore, the tax on this freedom of speech and expression is vio











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top