( 1 ) IN this case, the Counsel for the petitioners has submitted written arguments. The Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has also submitted written arguments to which the Counsel for the petitioners submitted arguments in rejoinder and further arguments in rejoinder. However, the Counsel for the petitioners is not present to make the oral submissions.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case, in brief, are that the owners of the property in dispute were Ranchhodlal Vithaldas and others. The property in dispute has been granted on lease to the petitioners by two separate registered deeds. The first deed is dated 16th December, 1950 in respect of the land admeasuring 1,386 sq. yds. of land of final Plot No. 67/1 in favour of the petitioner No. 3 for a period of 14 years at an annual rent of Rs. 1,150. 00. On the same date, another lease deed was executed of the land admeasuring 2,099 sq. yds. of the Final Plot No. 67/2 for a period of 14 years in the name of the father of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 at an annual rent of rs. 1,901/ -. Ranchhodlal Vithaldas and others, the original owners of the land in dispute sold the same to Jethabhai Amratlal Trust on 7th May, 1962. On 7-5-1962, v