SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 41

R.BALIA
PATEL NANJI BHOVAN DUDHATRA – Appellant
Versus
PATEL NARAN MITHA SUKHADIYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.N.Raval, H.A.RAICHURA, SURESH M.SHAH

R. BALIA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned Advocates for the parties. This appeal is against order dated 10-1-1991 passed by the Second Extra Assistant Judge, Junagadh allowing the respondent-plaintiffs appeal against judgment and decree dismissing the plaintiffs suit and remanding the case for trial afresh in exercise of power under order 41 Rule 23-A of Civil Procedure Code.

( 2 ) ). The respondent-plaintiff has filed a civil suit in the Court of Civil Judge (J. D.) for possession of land allegedly forming part of Survey No. 35/2 of which he claimed to be exclusive owner of the land admeasuring 4 acres. According to the plaintiff he has purchased the suit land by registered sale deed on 9-3-1960 for consideration of Rs. 2,500. 00 from heirs of Sandhi Kasam Umar and the defendant has purchased the land adjoining the northern side of the plaintiffs land bearing Survey No. 35/ 1 about 6 to 7 years prior to the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff, defendant has encroached upon parcel of land admeasuring about 19 gunthas towards the northern side of Survey No. 35/2, therefore, the present suit for possession and permanent injunction was filed. After the trial suit was dismissed the plaintiff p















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top