SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 54

J.M.PANCHAL, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
CHHAGAN RANCHHOD KUKVAVA – Appellant
Versus
GENERAL MANAGER,western RAILWAY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.J.YAGNIK, P.H.PATHAK

K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, J.

( 1 ) THE order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, ahmedabad Bench in O. A. No. 426 of 1995 is challenged by way of this petition before us. The petitioner contends that he was a casual labourer in Railway in Bhavnagar Unit from 24-12-1982 to 20-3-1984 and he had worked for 431 days and therefore, it is claimed that his name should be included in the live register for the casual labourers maintained by the respondents. In the original application, he had also prayed for a declaration that the action of the respondents in preparing and notifying list of casual labourers, who had worked prior to 1-1-1981 is illegal and that the respondents should be directed to prepare up-to-date list of casual labourers. Before the Tribunal, the respondents contended that the name of the petitioner cannot be included in the live register, as he had worked for a period after 1-1-1981. The respondents also contended that the claim of the petitioner is belated and the original application was liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay.

( 2 ) THE Tribunal, after having considered the matter, held that the application filed by the petitioner was highly belated, as cause of a













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top