SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 77

KUNDAN SINGH, R.K.ABICHANDANI
Praful Chunilal Patel – Appellant
Versus
M. J. Makwana or His Successor Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MANISH R.BHATT, MIHIR H.JOSHI, S.N.DIVETIA

R. K. ABICHANDANI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in these two petitions seek to challenge the notices dated 29th March, 1996 at Annexure "a" to the petitions, issued by the respondent Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, proposing to reopen the completed assessment of the petitioners for the Assessment Year 1991-92. The facts of both these petitions are almost identical and the parties have filed their complete papers in Special civil Application No. 4201/96 and argued that case as a main matter. The asscssee of special Civil Application No. 4203/96 has challenged identical notice issued under Sec. 148 of the Act on identical grounds and the learned Advocates appearing lor both the sides have raised common contentions in both these petitions. The facts of Special Civil application No. 4201/96 are being set out and the facts of the other petition admittedly being almost identical, are not repeated.

( 2 ) THE petitioner had filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 1991-92 on 21st October, 1992, declaring his total income at Rs. 27,118/- alongwith the statement of income, notes appended thereto and other enclosures which are at Anncxure "c" to the petition. The case of the petit



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top