SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 119

M.S.SHAH
PATEL BALDEVBHAI AMBALAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.S.JAVERI, P.B.MAJUMDAR

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution challenges the notification dated December 31, 1997 (Annexure "i") issued by the State Government under S. 7 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879, (hereinafter referred to as "the B. L. R. Code") insofar as it has shifted three villages - Amja, Mubarakpura and chandisana from the Kalol taluka of Mehsana district into the Mansa taluka of gandhinagar district.

( 2 ) IN the month of October, 1997, the State Government had decided to bifurcate certain districts and talukas and in that process, the district Mehsana was bifurcated into two districts, i. e. , Mehsana and Patan. Some of the talukas and villages from mehsana district were also amalgamated with the existing Gandhinagar district. In this process, certain talukas also came to be bifurcated and villages forming part of the original talukas came to be amalgamated with one or the other taluka. The notifications under S. 7 of the B. L. R. Code specifying the constitution of the districts and talukas were issued on October 15, 1997. Separate notifications were issued for separate talukas and each of the concerned notifications was accompanied by a Schedule contai




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top