C.K.BUCH, Y.B.BHATT
SANTRAM KARSAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE are appeals arising under Sec. 54 of the Land acquisition Act read with Sec. 96 C. P. C. filed by the original claimants-land-holders, challenging the common judgment and awards passed by the Reference Court under sec. 18 of the said Act.
( 2 ) THE pertinent and relevant facts in brief are as under :
( 3 ) THE lands in question were acquired for the purpose of Demy-2 Irrigation scheme, and are situated in and around village Rajavad, Taluka Morbi, District rajkot. The notification under Sec. 4 of the said Act was dated 19/02/1979, which", however, came to be published in the Government Gazette only on 10/05/1979. At this stage, we may only emphasize that there is a substantial interval between the making of the notification, and the publication; thereof, the significance whereof will be discussed hereinafter. The notification under Sec. 6 of the said Act was published on 3/01/1980. 3. 1 After going through the procedure required by law/the Land Acquisition officer declared his award under Sec. 11 of the said Act on 26/03/1981. In the said award, the L. A. O. , determined the market value of the lands in question by categorizing them according to the nature
referred : Land Acquisition Officer and Asstt.Commissioner,Mangalore v. Belekal Krishna Bhat
State of Bihar v. Ratan Lal Sahu
O.Janardan Reddy v. Spl. Dy. Collector, L.A.Unit IV
overruled : Naraiandas Jain v. Agra Nagar Mahapalika
relied on : Yadavrao P. Pathade v. State of Maharashtra
referred : Periyar and Pareekalli Rubber Ltd. v. State of Kerala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.