SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 130

C.K.BUCH, Y.B.BHATT
SANTRAM KARSAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HARSHA N.DEVANI, P.V.Hathi, S.J.DAVE

Y. B. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THESE are appeals arising under Sec. 54 of the Land acquisition Act read with Sec. 96 C. P. C. filed by the original claimants-land-holders, challenging the common judgment and awards passed by the Reference Court under sec. 18 of the said Act.

( 2 ) THE pertinent and relevant facts in brief are as under :

( 3 ) THE lands in question were acquired for the purpose of Demy-2 Irrigation scheme, and are situated in and around village Rajavad, Taluka Morbi, District rajkot. The notification under Sec. 4 of the said Act was dated 19/02/1979, which", however, came to be published in the Government Gazette only on 10/05/1979. At this stage, we may only emphasize that there is a substantial interval between the making of the notification, and the publication; thereof, the significance whereof will be discussed hereinafter. The notification under Sec. 6 of the said Act was published on 3/01/1980. 3. 1 After going through the procedure required by law/the Land Acquisition officer declared his award under Sec. 11 of the said Act on 26/03/1981. In the said award, the L. A. O. , determined the market value of the lands in question by categorizing them according to the nature



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top