SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 152

D.C.SRIVASTAVA
NOORBIBI – Appellant
Versus
AYESHABIBI W/o. GULAMNABI CHANDMIYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: RUPAL R.PATEL, S.C.SHAH, S.N.SHELAT, VASUBEN SHAH

D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THESE three matters involving common questions of law and fact are proposed to be disposed of by a common judgment.

( 2 ) IN the trial Court two Suit Nos. 409 of 1971 and 1000 of 1972 were disposed of by consolidated judgment against which two Civil Appeals and cross-objections were filed in the lower appellate Court.

( 3 ) THE brief facts are that two houses Nos. 497 and 498 together with open land on the east of House No. 497 situated in village Katargam, District Surat were owned by Jahangir Vazir @ Malik Jahangir. Suit No. 409 of 1971 was filed by the sons of Malik Jahangir. It was alleged that Kulsumbibi was married to Malik Jahangir and at that time Malik Jahangir made gift of house No. 497 in her favour through registered Gift Deed dated 16-4-1928. This house measured 13. 8" x 30. 2". However, some error crept in the deed and dimension was incorrectly shown therein. This Gift deed was attacked on the ground that it was a conditional gift and that gift was not followed by delivery of possession and that the gift was also contingent and the contingency contemplated in the Gift Deed never arose. Hence, the gift was invalid. The defendant Nos. 11 and 12







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top