ANIL R.DAVE, K.SREEDHAR RAO
KAUSHIKBHAI K. PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE. Ms. Amee Yajnik, Assistant Government pleader, waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents.
( 2 ) WHEN this petition came up for hearing on 16-4-1998, Counsel appearing on either side wanted main petition itself heard and disposed of. Accordingly, as agreed to by Counsel, we heard arguments at length. We are disposing of the same by this judgment.
( 3 ) GUJARAT State Legislature amended the Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 by Act 3 of 1992. As a result of the amendment, sub-S. (5) of S. 3a was substituted. It dealt with the cases of omnibuses. By sub-clause (a) to sub-S. (5), an owner of an omnibus is entitled to refund of the tax upto a maximum of three months in an year on proof of non-user. If refund is claimed for more than three months in any year, he must establish non-user of the omnibus for reasons beyond his control to the satisfaction of an Authorised Officer. The consequence is that on account of non-user of an omnibus, the owner or person having possession or control of the vehicle can get refund of the tax for a period of three months, if he shows that the omnibus has not been used or kept for use during that period. In case refu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.