SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 269

M.S.SHAH
HINDUSTAN DORR-OLIVER LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
VADODARA MUNICIPAL corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.A.ADESHARA, PRANAV G.DESAI, R.D.DAVE

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner-Company has prayed for a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ or order or direction quashing and setting aside Resolution Nos. 4 and 5 dated 19-3-1998 passed by the Standing Committee of the Vadodara Municipal Corporation (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Corporation") and also to direct the corporation to award and accept both the contracts in question to the petitioner in respect of Atladara and Gajarawadi Sewage Treatment Plants.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to filing of the present petition, as averred by the petitioner, are as under :-

( 3 ) THE petitioner-Company is engaged in the business and activities of environmental and Solid-Liquid separation activities and DAP Fertilizers including giving treatment to Sewage-Water Treatment Plant etc. The petitioner-Company has collaboration with Dorr-Oliver Inc. of U. S. A.

( 4 ) IN July 1997 the Corporation had issued a public notice inviting tenders for repairing works of mechanical parts of Sewage Treatment Plants at Atladara/ gajarawadi and to put the said plants into operational condition. Four parties submitted their tenders in r
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top