SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 313

S.D.PANDIT
Ahmedabad New Textile Mills – Appellant
Versus
Rajubhai Dalchandbhai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: NANAVATI AND NANAVATI, P.J.MEHTA

S. D. PANDIT, J.

( 1 ) RULES. Mr. Mehta waives service of Notice of Rule.

( 2 ) PRESENT writ petition is filed by the employer to challenge the order passed by the industrial Court, Ahmedabad in Revision Application No. 13 of 1997 on 26. 9. 1997.

( 3 ) THE respondent has filed T. Application No. 292 of 1992 before the Labour Court, ahmedabad and in support of his claim he has produced some documents. One of the documents produced by him is the gate pass, copy of which is produced at Annexure F on page 37 of this petition. When the witness for the present petitioner was in the witness box, the respondent wanted to ask the witness to identify the signature on the said document. Admittedly, said document is a xerox copy and the original is not produced by the petitioner. It is also submitted before me that during his testimony, the respondent has not also made out any case about the loss of original as well as how the petitioner came in possession of the copy of the document. When the respondent wanted to show the document and ask the witness to identify the signature on the same, objection was raised on behalf of the present petitioner contending that the document, in question, is no




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top