S.D.PANDIT
NADIAD MUNICIPALITY – Appellant
Versus
GHANSHYAM R. BAROT – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE. Mr. P. M. Thakkar, Senior Counsel for the respondents waives service of rule.
( 2 ) PETITIONER-NADIAD Municipality has filed the present petition to challenge the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad, on 21-5-1998 in Complaint no. 137 of 1994.
( 3 ) THE respondent Nos. 1 to 32 are the employees of the present petitioner. Out of these respondents, except respondent Pramodbhai M. Dave, Bhaskar R. Barot, naimash V. Desai, Mustufa R. Shabhai are appointed in the year 1995 by passing a resolution by the petitioner-Municipality. The Municipality had also passed another resolution by same time, by which, about 54 employees working with the municipality were given promotion. The Collector of Kheda was pleased to declare both these resolutions as invalid and illegal and cancelled the said resolutions. The action of the Collector in cancelling the said resolutions was challenged by the present respondents by preferring a Revision/appeal before the Secretary of Urban development, whereas, the other group of 54 persons had challenged the said action of Collector by preferring a petition in this Court. One of the contentions raised in the said petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.