SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 423

S.D.PANDIT
NADIAD MUNICIPALITY – Appellant
Versus
GHANSHYAM R. BAROT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.J.BHATT, H.J.NANAVATI

S. D. PANDIT, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. P. M. Thakkar, Senior Counsel for the respondents waives service of rule.

( 2 ) PETITIONER-NADIAD Municipality has filed the present petition to challenge the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad, on 21-5-1998 in Complaint no. 137 of 1994.

( 3 ) THE respondent Nos. 1 to 32 are the employees of the present petitioner. Out of these respondents, except respondent Pramodbhai M. Dave, Bhaskar R. Barot, naimash V. Desai, Mustufa R. Shabhai are appointed in the year 1995 by passing a resolution by the petitioner-Municipality. The Municipality had also passed another resolution by same time, by which, about 54 employees working with the municipality were given promotion. The Collector of Kheda was pleased to declare both these resolutions as invalid and illegal and cancelled the said resolutions. The action of the Collector in cancelling the said resolutions was challenged by the present respondents by preferring a Revision/appeal before the Secretary of Urban development, whereas, the other group of 54 persons had challenged the said action of Collector by preferring a petition in this Court. One of the contentions raised in the said petition














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top