SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 494

R.BALIA
GHANSHYAMBHAI NABHERAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.G.VORA, K.S.JAVERI, S.D.TALATI

R. BALIA, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. S. D. Talati, learned A. G. P. waives service of rule.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to filing of this petition are that one Shakaraji who was a co-sharer of land comprised in Block No. 215 admeasuring 2 acres 33 gunthas executed a Will on 1/03/1986 in favour of the present petitioner to the extent of his share therein. Said Shakaraji died on 7/10/1986. The petitioner has claimed mutation in the land records in his favour on the basis of the said Will. On 1/07/1987, the entry No. 1692 was amended to that effect. On 18-2-1989, the Deputy Collector initiated proceedings for revising the said alteration under the bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the "act of 1947" ). By Order dated 22/08/1989, the deputy Collector cancelled the entry No. 1692 on the ground that as the petitioner has acquired the land by way of a Will which has resulted in sub-division of the block in breach of the provisions of the Act of 1947 and as the legatee is also not an agriculturist to whom any transfer could be made in view of Sec. 63 of the bombay Tenancy Act, amendment in entry No. 1692 is liable to be cancelled.

( 3 ) THE pe
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top