SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 504

S.K.KESHOTE
MADHUR GARMENTS – Appellant
Versus
HASMUKH SHOPPING CENTRE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.V.Trivedi, M.B.GANDHI, R.J.SHARMA

S. K. KESHOTE, J.

( 1 ) BY this revision application under Sec. 115 of the C. P. C. , the petitioner challenges the order dated 28-2-1997 of the City Civil Court No. 18. Ahmedabad passed below Ex. 1. Restoration Application No. 792 of 1995. Under this order, the learned trial Court set aside the judgment and decree dated 22-9-1994 passed in Summary Suit No. 2610 of 1993 and the suit is ordered to be restored to the file. The respondents were directed to file a written statement within 10 days from the date of the order. It is not in dispute that in pursuance of the order of the trial Court, the respondents have already filed written statement in the suit.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case, in brief are that the original plaintiff-petitioner filed summary Suit No. 2610 of 1993 against the defendant-respondent for the recovery of Rs. 52,974. 00. The defendants-respondents filed their appearance through their advocate and furnished solvent security of Rs. 55,000. 00 as per the order of the Court. Thereafter, the plaintiff-petitioner has taken out summons for judgment on 24-6-1992. The matter was kept for hearing on 7-7-1994. On which date, the learned advocate for the defendants-respondents









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top