SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 608

S.M.SONI, A.K.TRIVEDI
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
AMANULLAKHAN BHUREKHAN PATHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.N.Raval, Z.N.SHAIKH

S. M. SONI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned A. P. P. Mr. K. T. Dave for the applicant-State, mr. B. N. Raval, learned Advocate for respondent No. 1 and Mr. Z. N. Shaikh, learned advocate for respondent No. 2.

( 2 ) THE State has filed this application for condonation of delay of 86 days in filing an application for leave to prefer an appeal against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Special Judge, Dist. Kaira, at Nadiad in Special Case No. 4 of 1993 decided on 18/10/1997.

( 3 ) BEFORE we consider whether there is sufficient cause for delay in filing this application for leave to appeal, it is necessary to note whether any period of limitation is prescribed either in the Limitation Act or in Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 ("the New Code" for short) to prefer an application for leave to appeal ? As in the present matter, the case is instituted on police report. Originally, in the old Code, i. e. , Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (old Code for short), sub- secs. (1) and (2) of Sec. 417 provided for appeal from an order of acquittal passed in a case instituted on police report. On repeal of the same, there is a similar provision in sub-secs. (1) and (2) of Sec. 378 of the new Code.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top