SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 618

J.N.BHATT, A.M.KAPADIA
AAMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.P.RAVAL, P.M.THAKKAR

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THE imprisonment of life imposed upon the appellant No. 1 Aamad alias Kalu. Abdulbhai Majothi and appellant No. 2 Akbar Abdulbhai majothi/original accused Nos. I and 2 ("a 1 and A 2", for short, respectively ). On being found guilty for having committed offences punishable under Sec. 302 and Sec. 504, read with Sec. 114 of Indian Penal Code (i. P. C. for short) and also under Sec. 37 (1) read with Sec. 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 (the Act for short), by. learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot. in Sessions Case No. 82 of 1990, by judgment and order passed on 30-9-1991, is in the focus in this appeal under Sec. 374 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (cr. P. C. for short ).

( 2 ) A short spectrum of material facts arising from the prosecution case, needs articulation, so as to appreciate the merits orthe appeal at the instance of the original accused and challenge by the respondent-State.

( 3 ) ORIGINAL accused Nos. 1 and 2 are brothers and they are also brothers-in-law of the elder brother of deceased Kasam Osman Majothi. The incident in question occurred, on 22-8-1990, between 10-30 a. m. to 11 a. m. . near Street No. 4. Ranchhodnagar Society,








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top