SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 621

ANIL R.DAVE, R.BALIA
BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.V.CHHATRAPATI, JAGDISH S.JOSHI, KAMAL MEHTA

R. BALIA, J.

( 1 ) THE Gujarat Sales Tax Tribunal has referred the following question of law arising out of its decision dated 31. 8. 1988, in revision application No. 41 of 1985 at the instance of assessee:"whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has erred in confirming the order of levy of interest under the provisions of Section 47 (4a) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, relying upon the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in M/s. Associated Cement Company v. Commercial Tax Officer (48 STC 466, more particularly, in view of the recent judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in M/s. J. K. Synthetics v. Commercial Tax Officer (1994) 94 STC 422"

( 2 ) THE facts that have given rise to this question are that the applicant M/s. Brooke Bond India Ltd. has been carrying on the business of tea and coffee. It holds registration certificate under Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 and under the Central Sales Tax Act in respect of its business that is being carried on in the State of Gujarat where it has a factory at Jamnagar and further divisions at important centres in the State of Gujarat. The period of taxation in respect of which present controversy has arisen is




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top