SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 714

ANIL R.DAVE, R.BALIA
COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
SUPER SCIENTIFIC CLOCK COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MANISH R.BHATT

R. BALIA, J.

( 1 ) THE following question has been referred at the instance of revenue and statement of case has been submitted by the Tribunal to this Court on an application made under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax in respect of assessment for the assessment year 1977-78 in the case of respondent assessee:"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that the sum of Rs. 89,722. 00 paid as know-how fees to the foreign collaborator by the assessee was an allowable expenditure for the assessment year in question?"

( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances in which the aforesaid question has been referred to this court are that a sum of Rs. 89,722. 00 paid by the assessee to its foreign collaborator as technical-knowhow fees during the previous year relevant to assessment year 1976-77 was not allowed as deduction by the assessing officer on the ground that the liability to pay had arisen during the previous year relevant to assessment year 1975-76 and assessee is not entitled to claim the same on the payment basis for the assessment year 1976-77 as he is maintaining his accounts o







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top