D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) CORAM : MR. JUSTICEThese two Miscellaneous Civil Applications are proposed to be disposed of by a common order.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts on which these applications have been moved are as under :civil Revision Application No. 842 of 1989 was a Civil Revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This revision was decided on merits on 14. 7. 1998. On that day list was revised twice, but none appeared for the revisionist. As such the impugned order under revision was perused and the learned Counsel for the respondent was heard and Judgment was dictated.

( 3 ) CIVIL Revision Application No. 327/87 was likewise decided on 14. 7. 1998 after hearing the learned Counsel for the revisionist. None-appeared for the respondents in this revision as well.

( 4 ) REVIEW of these two orders is sought in these two Miscellaneous Civil Applications. Shri S. N. Shelat, learned Counsel for the applicants and Shri S. M. Shah, learned Counsel for the opposite party were heard at length. Before applications for review can be granted there are two hurdles before the applicant and it is only on clearing these hurdles that the petitioner can succeed.

( 5 ) THE first hurdle is t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document