SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 102

S.K.KESHOTE
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
MANGUBHAI KIKABHAI HALPATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.C.BHALJA, J.B.PARDIWALA

S. K. KESHOTE, J.

( 1 ) ). This revision application by the State of Gujarat and mamlatdar, Navsari under Sec. 115 of the Civil Procedure Code arises from the order dated 14-7-1998 of the Civil Judge (S. D.), Navsari in Misc. Civil (Fari File) application No. 41 of 1996 under which the application filed by the petitioners for the restoration of their Special Civil Suit No. 37 of 1991 which has been dismissed for non-prosecution, has been rejected.

( 2 ) ). The facts of the case in brief are that the State of Gujarat and Mamlatdar, navsari filed a Special Civil Suit No. 37 of 1991 against the defendants-respondents for the recovery of Rs. 83,948. 87 ps. The summons of the suit were duly served on the defendants-respondents and they had also submitted their written statements. The suit was fixed for recording of the evidence of the plaintiffs-petitioners on 10-10-1995 in the trial Court.

( 3 ) ). It is a case of the plaintiffs-petitioners that they remained present through their advocate on each and every date fixed by the Court. On 27-8-1996 their suit was fixed for recording of evidence of the plaintiffs-petitioners. The Advocate of the plaintiffs-petitioners was in need of some doc



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top