D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) ). THIS revision under Sec. 29 (1) of the Bombay Rent control Act, 1947 has been filed by the revisionist-defendant No. 2 challenging concurrent finding of the two Courts below treating him sub-tenant of the defendant no. 1 - respondent No. 2 of this Civil Revision Application.

( 2 ) THE brief facts are that Natraj Theatre respondent No. 1 is the owner and glandlord of the disputed premises consisting of stall, some open space and room. It was let out to Gujarat Bottling Company Private Limited - defendant No. 1. The allegation of the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 was that respondent No. 2 had illegally sub-let, assigned or transferred in any manner the disputed accommodation to the revisionist-defendant No. 2 and on this count the eviction of the tenant-in-chief as well as sub-tenant was sought. In addition to this, eviction was also sought on the ground that the tenant-in-chief was in arrears of rent for more than six months and he did not pay the same within a month of service of notice of demand.

( 3 ) THE case of the defendant No. 2 in the trial Court was that he is not subtenant nor the disputed premises has been assigned or transferred to him by the te

Click Here to Read the rest of this document