SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 343

H.R.SHELAT
INDRASING M. RAOL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: NITIN AMIN, S.T.MEHTA

H. R. SHELAT, J.

( 1 ) ). THE appellant (original accused) came to be convicted of the offence punishable under Sec. 498-A of Indian Penal Code by the then learned additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad on 11/03/1988, in Sessions Case no. 99 of 1987 and sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three years and a fine of Rs. 1,000. 00 in default to suffer further Rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. He has, therefore, filed this appeal challenging the legality and validity of the order of conviction. In order to appreciate rival contentions of the parties, necessary facts may, in brief, be stated.

( 2 ) ). Kailasba who committed suicide was the daughter of Motiba Pratapji biholla. She married the appellant in the month of February, 1986. At that time, the appellant was serving in Army at Meerut in U. P. After solemnization of the marriage, Kailasba continued to stay at Ahmedabad with her mother, while the appellant went back to Meerut. It appears that the appellant was trying for his transfer to Ahmedabad and it was also the desire of Motiba that her daughter kailasba should stay with her for sometime. Around October, 1986, the appellant succeeded in gett


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top