SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 512

A.L.DAVE
SUNIL KUMAR MANGALSINH KSHATRIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.S.DAVE, B.S.PATEL, UMESH TRIVEDI

A. L. DAVE, J.

( 1 ) THE revisioner herein is accused No. 6 in NDPS Case No. 8 of 1998. By this revision application, he challenges the order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara, passed below Ex. 21 on 10/03/1999. The revisioners had approached the Additional Sessions Judge with application Ex. 21 for framing a separate charge and conducting a separate trial against him relying upon Section 218 of Code of Criminal Procedure. That application came to be rejected and, hence, this revision application.

( 2 ) FACTS:- Upon intelligence received by police, a raid was conducted on 12/03/1998 at about 10. 00 A. M. on the site of Rolex Pharmaceuticals Limited, at P. O. Rania, taluka Savli, district Baroda, by officers of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) to find that mandrax tablets in large quantity were being manufactured over there and were being supplied. During the course of interrogation and investigation, it was revealed that six persons were involved in the said offence and, therefore, they all were arraigned. The prosecution case was that accused No. 1 was the master brain working behind the project, accused Nos. 2 and 3 were involved in manufacture of the tablets, No. 4













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top