R.BALIA
MOHIBULLAH USMANBHAI SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner has claimed the following reliefs in this petition substantively :-[a] Quashing and setting aside the order dated 31/1/95 [annexure i] directing respondent no. 1 to exercise his vested power under proviso [iii] below Rule 161 of B. C. S. R. together with continuity of service with all consequential benefits forthwith till the respondent nos. 2 onwards may be finalise all the terminal benefits on or before the date[s] by which they like to retire the petitioner or an award Rs. 2 lakhs per detaining be awarded to petitioner. [b] quashing and setting aside later part of order dated 4/11/96 directing respondent No. 2 to treat the impugned periods as on duty for all purposes by maintaining the leave balance of petitioner for encashment. [b-1] quashing and setting aside the part of recoveries from the face of order dated 4/11/1996 [annexure VII] passed by the respondent no. 2 of Rs. 63,590/directing the respondent No. 5 to refund the aforesaid recoveries affected on 5/11/1996 together with appropriate rate [s] of interest thereon from 5/11/1996 till the date of refund of the same. [c] to award the compensatory amounts of Rs. 6,80,000. 00 as prayed for vid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.