( 1 ) HEARD Mr. Raval, the learned advocate for the petitioner corporation and Mr. Desai, the learned advocate for the respondent. The facts of the present case, in short, are that the respondent was working with the petitioner Corporation as conductor and on 17th August, 1981, while he was on route from Ambaji to Abu, it was found that he had not issued tickets in favour of some passengers and had also not issued tickets to two passengers though fare was already collected from them. Report to that effect was made against him and after regular departmental inquiry, the competent authority, under order dated 15. 12. 1982, directed stoppage of five annual increments of the respondent with future effect. The reviewing authority, however, reviewed the entire matter and issued further show cause notice dated 13. 6. 83 directing the respondent workman to show cause as to why the penalty of dismissal from service should not be imposed. The respondent replied the said show cause notice vide his explanation, and, thereafter, the reviewing authority, under its order dated 6th July, 1983, dismissed the respondent from service. The respondent workman challenged the said action