SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 610

D.C.SRIVASTAVA
SABURBHAI HEMABHAI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, HARSHA N.DEVANI, N.V.Solanki

D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this writ petition has challenged the order dated 15. 4. 1995 annexure-B passed by the Deputy Collector, order annexure-C dated 31. 7. 1996 passed in revision by the Collector and order annexure-E dated 17. 3. 1997 passed by the Secretary (Appeal), Revenue Department, Gujarat State on the ground that these orders are illegal and arbitrary. In the writ petition five questions had been posed for consideration by this court.

( 2 ) THE brief facts giving rise to this petition are as under:-

( 3 ) OUT of 5 acres 34 gunthas land of block No. 7 of village Tajpura, Dist. Kaira, the petitioner had purchased 1 acre 18 gunthas through a registered sale deed from its owners for Rs. 4200. 00 on 9-10/5/1974. The petitioner claims to be an Adivasi so also the owners of the land are said to be Adivasis. After purchasing the land the petitioner cultivated the same without any intervention and spent considerable amount in getting the land improved. After a period of 15 years of peaceful cultivation, the petitioner received show cause notice from the Deputy Collector calling upon him to show cause why the land in question should not be forfeited to the Gover




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top