SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 636

K.M.MEHTA, B.C.PATEL
CROMPTON GREAVES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.S.JETLY, M.G.DOSHIT, MANISH R.BHATT, P.G.DESAI, PRADIP S.JETLY

PATEL, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these petitions are disposed of by this common judgment as question involved in both the petitions is same.

( 2 ) SO far as the facts are concerned, we have taken the facts from Special Civil Application no. 7070/96.

( 3 ) IN the present petition, the petitioner- M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd and another are challenging the notice of re-assessment issued under Section 44 of Gujarat Sales Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") dated 20/07/1996 issued by the Sales Tax Officer (II), Ahmedabad for assessment year 1991-92 (and 1992-93) on the ground that deductions with regard to sales made against certificate in Form 17a prescribed under Rule 24 (2-A) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Rules, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") read with section 12 (1) were erroneously allowed in the assessment made under section 41. In fact, grievance is made by the petitioners that they have neither made any sale on the strength of certificate in Form 17a nor claimed any deduction during the assessment year 1991-92. Even the assessing officer had no occasion to allow such deductions. BACKGROUND OF FACTS:

( 4 ) THE petitioner No. 1 is a company incorporated under the provisions of th















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top