SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 699

C.K.THAKKER, D.P.BUCH
D. M. GOHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: Paresh Upadhyay

C. K. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed against the summary dismissal of Special Civil Application No. 9527 of 1999.

( 2 ) APPELLANT was the original petitioner. He was prosecuted for offences punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. He was, however, acquitted by a Special Court. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the acquittal recorded by the trial court, the State has filed Criminal Appeal No. 758 of 1994. The said appeal is already admitted by this Court and is pending for final hearing.

( 3 ) IT appears that after the appellant was acquitted, an order of reinstatement was passed in his favour on 6/09/1995 - (Annexure c to the petition ). The appellant, in view of the acquittal recorded by the Special Judge was ordered to be reinstated on certain terms and conditions. One of the conditions provided that since a decision was taken to challenge the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court by filing an appeal in the High Court of Gujarat, the appellant would be bound by the decision which would be rendered by the High Court of Gujarat and in the meanwhile he will not claim regularisation of the period of suspension. The appellant was actually reinstated o















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top