SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 681

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :J.M.Panchal, P.B.MAJMUDAR
PUNAMCHAND ASHOK MAHESHWARI - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
L.P.A. 429 of 1989
Decided On : 12/07/1999

Advocates Appeared: S.T.MEHTA, Y.S.MANKAD

Headnote:

Letters Patent Appeal – Clause-15 – Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Vested right to claim allotment of land – Appeal against judgment passed by Single Judge in Special Civil Application by which the order passed by the Collector rejecting the application made by appellant for allotment of land as confirmed by order passed by Government in appeal filed by the appellant, is upheld – Appellant, who was then serving as clerk in the Office of Sales Tax Officer made an application to the Deputy Collector and requested him to allot land out of survey No. 314 along with application, appellant also produced a certificate indicating that he belongs to scheduled caste – Collector application for allotment of land made earlier was rejected, as the said plot was reserved by the Government for Government use – Appellant vehemently submitted that after removal of encroachment, there was no reason for Collector not to allot the land applied for by the appellant and, therefore, the impugned judgment deserves to be set aside – Held, Collector was justified in rejecting the application which was made by the appellant for allotment of land – The submission that other persons belonging to scheduled caste were allotted land and appellant should have been allotted land, is devoid of merits As averred by the appellant himself in Para-2 of the petition, a member belonging to scheduled caste is entitled to allotment of land admeasuring 100 sq. mts. Only – Initially appellant had applied for allotment of land admeasuring 200 sq. yds. and subsequently he had changed his demand by making application for allotment of land admeasuring 154 sq. mts – In view of the different resolutions which are referred to by appellant in the petition, a member belonging to scheduled caste cannot be allotted land It hardly needs to be emphasised that this is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution and Court while exercising powers under Article 226 cannot direct authorities to perpetuate illegality – Now, plot which was originally applied for by the appellant is reserved by the Government for Government purpose and Single Judge was justified in summarily dismissing the petition – Appellant has no vested right for allotment of plot and after considering relevant factors, the Collector declined demand made by the appellant for allotment of land – Order passed by Collector confirmed – Appeal dismissed. (Para 5)

J. M. PANCHAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal, which is filed under Clause-15 of the Letters Patent, is directed against judgment dated 19/07/1989, rendered by the learned Single Judge, in Special Civil Application No. 5128/89, by which the order passed by the Collector, Kutch rejecting the application made by the appellant for allotment of land admeasuring 154 sq. mts. out of survey No. 314 situated near Nutan Co. operative Housing Society at Bhuj, District : Kutch as confirmed by order dated 29/03/1989 passed by the Government in appeal filed by the appellant, is upheld.

( 2 ) THE appellant, who was then serving as clerk in the Office of Sales Tax Officer, Gandhidham, made an application dated 16/01/1982 to the Deputy Collector, Bhuj and requested him to allot 200 sq. yds. of land out of survey No. 314 situated near Nutan Co. operative Housing Society at Bhuj, District : Kutch. Along with the application, the appellant also produced a certificate indicating that he belongs to scheduled caste. In the application it was, inter-alia, mentioned by the appellant that as he belongs to scheduled caste, he was entitled to allotment of land in view of Government Resolution dated 17/10/1981. Detailed inquiry was made by the Deputy Collector and the City Survey Superintendent. The appellant submitted several reminders to the authorities, but the application made by him was not disposed of. Five years later, the Collector, Kutch at Bhuj rejected the application made by the appellant vide order dated 12/02/1987 on the ground that the land applied for by the appellant was encroached upon and, therefore, it was not possible to allot the same to the appellant. The appellant made another application to the Collector, Kutch on February 16, 1987 stating that the land should be allotted to him after removing encroachment. In the alternative, he also pleaded in the said application that land with encroachment be allotted to him and he would get unauthorised encroachment removed in accordance with law. The appellant did not hear anything from the Collector in response to his application dated 16/02/1987. He, therefore, contacted the persons who had encroached upon the land which was applied for by him and got them removed voluntarily from the land. The appellant thereafter got an affidavit sworn from those who had encroached upon the land to the effect that they had voluntarily vacated the land. The appellant thereafter made another application to the Collector for allotment of land on 21/02/1987 and annexed with it a copy of affidavit which was sworn in by those persons who had encroached upon the land applied for by the appellant and who had later on vacated the same at the instance of the appellant. On receipt of the application, necessary inquiries were made by the competent authorities and a report was submitted to the Collector, Kutch mentioning, inter-alia, that the land applied for by the appellant was reserved for Government use and, therefore, it was not possible to allot the said land to the appellant, but another plot of land situated in Motilal Nehru Vyayam Shala area was available for allotment to the appellant. On receipt of the said report, Collector directed the Assistant Collector, Bhuj to ascertain from the appellant whether he was ready and willing to accept a plot of land situated in Motilal Nehru Vyayam Shala area. Therefore, the Assistant Collector addressed a letter dated October 12, 1987 calling upon the appellant to remain present before him, as he wanted to ascertain from the appellant whether he was ready and willing to take a plot of land in Motilal Nehru Vyayam Shala area. The appellant by his reply dated 23/10/1987 declined to accept the offer made by the Assistant Collector in respect of plot of land which was situated in Motilal Nehru Vyayam Shala area and requested the Assistant Collector to grant plot of land which was applied for by him earlier. The Collector, Kutch at Bhuj by his letter dated February 4, 1988 informed th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top