( 1 ) RULE. Learned Advocate Mr. B. M. Gupta for Respondents No. 1 to 3 and learned APP Mr. K. P. Raval for respondent No. 4 State waive service of rule on behalf of the respective parties.

( 2 ) IN this Revision, this court is called upon to examine the scope and jurisdiction of the Executive Magistrate under Sections 145 and 146 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the propriety of the order passed by the learned Executive Magistrate, under Section 146 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code for attachment of the property.

( 3 ) AS per the brief facts of the case, present petitioner No. 1 Parvatiben is the widow of Ramsinh Rajput and petitioner No. 2 - Lilaben is the daughter of Ramsinh Rajput. Opponent No. 1 Parulben, is the daughter-in-law of petitioner No. 1 i. e. widow of Rajendrasingh Rajput, a deceased son of petitioner No. 1. There is a property, i. e. a shop No. 9 in Nirav Shopping Centre on the ground floor, which is situated at Final Plot No. 106, T. P. Scheme No. 7, near Old Railway Crossing, Khokhra, Ahmedabad. It is the case of the present petitioner Parvatiben that his late husband Ramsinh Rajput had purchased the above mentioned property by a registered docu