SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 734

M.R.CALLA, P.K.SARKAR
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF AHMEDABAD – Appellant
Versus
MUKESHKUMAR BABULAL SHAH. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.P.TANNA, J.A.DAVE

M. R. CALLA, J.

( 1 ) ALL these Appeals were admitted by this Court after condoning the delay on 24. 11. 99 and the notices were made returnable on 20. 12. 99. However, the matters came up before the court on 21. 12. 99 and on that day Mr. J. A. Dave appeared in First Appeals Nos. 5854, 5855, 5859, 5861 and 5865 of 1995. It was also submitted that Mr. M. P. Prjapati is appearing for respondents in other seven Appeals, although Mr. Prajapati himself was not present. On the request of Mr. J. A. Dave the matters were directed to be posted for today to be taken up for final hearing.

( 2 ) HOWEVER, it is given out today by Mr. J. A. DAve that Mr. M. P. Prajapti was not appearing for respondents in the seven matters and the respondents in these seven Appeals have not been served. Notices issued by the Court had not returned back.

( 3 ) MR. TANNA has invited our attention to the order dt. 13. 8. 99 passed in Civil Application No. 8548 of 1999 in Civil Application No. 4483 of 1995 in First Appeal No. 5854 of 1995 and identical Application in other Appeals whereby for the reasons stated in that order dt. 13. 8. 99, the Court had passed an order to the following effect:-"for the foregoing rea














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top