SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 741

P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.M.PANCHAL
RAMIBEN WD/o MAGANJI GOVINDJI – Appellant
Versus
COMPETENT OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, SIDDHI D.TALATI

J. M. PANCHAL, P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) BY means of filing this appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, the appellants who are heirs and legal representatives of Maganji Govindji, have challenged legality of judgment dated 1/05/1992 rendered by the learned Single Judge, in Special Civil Application No. 2463/90, by which order dated April 5, 1988 passed by the Competent Authority and Deputy Collector, Urban Land Ceiling, Surat declaring 6088 sq. mts. of lands as excess land under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 as affirmed by order dated 5/07/1989 passed by the Urban Land Ceiling Tribunal in Appeal No. 51/88 is upheld.

( 2 ) THE appellants are heirs and legal representatives of deceased Maganji Govindji. The deceased was holding lands bearing survey no. 68 admeasuring 4654 sq. mts. and survey no. 73 admeasuring 3734 sq. mts. situated in the sim of village Jahangirabad, Taluka : Choryasi, District : Surat. On coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 ("the Act" for short), the deceased filed a statement under section 6 (1) of the Act before the Competent Authority specifying the location, extent, value of vacant la










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top