SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 266

M.S.SHAH
ATULBHAI BALABHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, D.P.Joshi, TUSHAR MEHTA

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution raises the following question for consideration :-"whether the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, constituted under the Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957, while exercising the powers of revision under Section 76 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, has the power to review its own decisions. "

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to filing of this petition, as averred by the petitioners, are as under :- the land in question situate in village Nikol, Taluka and District Ahmedabad City was held in the name of Bai Jadav i. e. the predecessor-in-title of the petitioners. In the year 1975, the Mamlatdar and Agricultural Land Tribunal, Ahmedabad initiated proceedings under Section 32g of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as "the Tenancy Act" ). After hearing the parties, the Mamlatdar and Agricultural Land Tribunal passed order dated 10. 2. 1975 fixing the purchase price. Respondent Nos. 2 to 8 (hereinafter referred to as "the respondents") filed an appeal before the Deputy Collector, Ahmedabad challenging the above order on 17. 4. 1995. By his judgment and order dated 29. 1.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top