SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 223

D.C.SRIVASTAVA
HANSKAMAL A. GROVER – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: N.D.GOHIL, Thakkar Associates

D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) SE three matters are proposed to be disposed of by common judgment and order.

( 2 ) SPECIAL Civil Application No. 10033 of 1998 is a writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India with prayer in the nature of a certiorari to quash the detention order dated 23/10/1998 passed by the Police commissioner, Surat City under Sec. 3 (2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social activities Act (for short "pasa") and in the nature of habeas corpus of immediate release of the petitioner from illegal detention.

( 3 ) THE prayer in Civil Application No. 180 of 1999 is for suspension of detention order dated 23-10-1998 and for release of the petitioner during pendency of Special Civil Application No. 10033 of 1998.

( 4 ) CIVIL Application No. 2019 of 1999 is an application for submitting certain documents to be placed along with Special Civil Application No. 10033 of 1998.

( 5 ) BRIEF facts giving rise to the writ petition are as under : the detaining Authority, namely, Police Commissioner, Surat City, passed the impugned detention order on 23-10-1998 in the interest of public order being subjectively satisfied from three registered criminal cases as well a



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top