SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 32

C.K.THAKKER, D.P.BUCH
VIRA VEJA SONDARVA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.M.BHAGAT, H.M.MEHTA, M.R.SHAH, S.N.SHELAT, VASAVDATTA BHATT

C. K. THAKKER, J.

( 1 ) ALL these petitions have been filed for an appropriate writ, direction or order quashing and setting aside the notification dated February 6, 1975 (Annexure D ), Government Resolution dated October 6, 1992 (Annexure G ) as amended on August 18, 1997 as also order passed by the Deputy Collector on April 19 , 1976 (Annexure E) and the order passed by the Deputy Conservator of Forest,dated December 8 , 1998 (Annexure U) and for an appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to process the papers for regularisation of encroachments made by the petitioners as per Government policy dated March 1, 1960 as amended from time to time. A prayer is also made directing the Deputy Conservator of Forest and Secretary to Government of Gujarat , Forest Department to regularise encroachment under the provisions of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Interim relief during the pendency of the petitions for maintenance of status quo was also prayed.

( 2 ) EARLIER, petitions came up for admission before the learned Single Judge of this Court and on December 11, 1988, notice was issued. It also appears that thereafter, constitutional validity of Forest (Conservation












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top