SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 124

Y.B.BHATT
GUJARAT ELECRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
BALLKHAN D. JOYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.G.CHAUHAN, R.C.Jani

Y. B. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India though styled as one under Articles 14 and 226 of the Constitution, at the instance of the Gujarat Electricity Board, challenging the judgement and award passed by the Labour Court, Kalol in Reference (LCK) No. 22/86.

( 2 ) I am conscious of the limitations of this court while dealing with petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, wherein findings of fact recorded by the lower courts on the basis of appreciation of evidence on record cannot lightly be interfered with. However, as I shall discuss hereinafter, there is no serious controversy as to the facts established on record, but the Labour Court has in interpreting the facts, added its own grossly exaggerated twist arising from its own compassionate view in the matter which has resulted in a miscarriage of justice. In my view, therefore, the impugned award requires to be interfered with.

( 3 ) THE respondent worked with the petitioner for two different periods and in two different capacities, as will be discussed hereinafter. There is no controversy that these two periods when he put in service were distinctly different and not
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top