SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 134

J.N.BHATT, C.K.BUCH
TATA IRON AND STEEL COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
MICRO FORGE (INDIA) LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.C.KAVINA, S.N.Soparkar

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) ADMIT. Service of notice is waived by learned advocate Mr S. N. Soparkar in O. J. Appeal No. 1/2000 and learned advocate Mr Kavina in O. J. Appeal No. 5/2000. In view of the facts and circumstances and at the request of the learned counsels appearing for the parties, both the appeals are ordered to be heard and disposed of finally, by this common judgment. Whether the order of the learned Company Judge, exercising his powers under section 433 (e) admitting and directing for advertisement in a winding up petition, at the instance of the original petitioning Company, Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, is vulnerable, assailable, unreasonable and unjust or not? is the heart and substratum of this group of two appeals, wherein, common questions are involved against the common order, and upon request, they being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) OBVIOUSLY, first it would prompt us to articulate and highlight the relevant and important factual aspects which have culminated into this group of two appeals. FACTUAL MATRIX:

( 3 ) THE Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, by filing Company Petition No. 134/99 for winding up of Micro Forge (India) Ltd. , inter alia































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top