C.K.THAKKER
RAMJIBHAI HARJIBHAI – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE. Mr. M. D. Pandya, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 waives the service of rule. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition has been taken up for final hearing to day.
( 2 ) THIS petition is filed by the petitioner for an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside supplementary as well as revised bills Annexures A and E respectively, and for declaration that the action of the Gujarat Electricity Board -respondent no. 1 herein and its officers is illegal, contrary to law, unwarranted, null and void. A prayer is also made to quash and set aside an order dt. 15th March, 1999 passed by the Appellate Committee in Appeal No. B. 240/98-99 and by directing the respondent -Board to refund an amount of Rs. 92,532. 00 already deposited by the petitioner with the Board along with interest thereon at the rate of 18% p. a. A further prayer was made restraining the respondent from disconnecting electricity supply provided to the petitioner for industrial purposes.
( 3 ) THE case of the petitioner is that he is running a textile factory at 68, Sonal Industrial Estate, Pandesara, Udhana, Surat. The petitioner was having electric conn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.