SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 222

C.K.THAKKER
RAMJIBHAI HARJIBHAI – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: DHIRENDRA MEHTA, M.D.PANDYA

C. K. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. M. D. Pandya, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 waives the service of rule. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition has been taken up for final hearing to day.

( 2 ) THIS petition is filed by the petitioner for an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside supplementary as well as revised bills Annexures A and E respectively, and for declaration that the action of the Gujarat Electricity Board -respondent no. 1 herein and its officers is illegal, contrary to law, unwarranted, null and void. A prayer is also made to quash and set aside an order dt. 15th March, 1999 passed by the Appellate Committee in Appeal No. B. 240/98-99 and by directing the respondent -Board to refund an amount of Rs. 92,532. 00 already deposited by the petitioner with the Board along with interest thereon at the rate of 18% p. a. A further prayer was made restraining the respondent from disconnecting electricity supply provided to the petitioner for industrial purposes.

( 3 ) THE case of the petitioner is that he is running a textile factory at 68, Sonal Industrial Estate, Pandesara, Udhana, Surat. The petitioner was having electric conn



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top