SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 308

J.N.BHATT
RAGHUBHAI M. DESAI – Appellant
Versus
VINAY VHAS,ias – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, M.B.GANDHI, UMESH TRIVEDI

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) WHETHER removal of petitioners from the office of councillors of Ghatlodiya Nagarpalika by the order of respondent No. 1, Director of Municipalities, dated 3. 3. 1999, in exercise of powers, under Section 37, of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 (`the Act for short) on the ground of irregularities and indulging in giving employment to the close relatives, without any procedure and unauthorisedly, is short, but significant question which has been raised before this court in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) A few material facts giving rise to this petition are narrated. At the outset, the petitioners were councillors of Ghatlodiya Nagarpanchayat and petitioner No. 1 was the President, at the relevant time, whose term expired long before and the terms of membership i. e. office of councillors expires around December this year, as stated at the Bar. The respondent is the Director of Municipalities who had initiated proceedings under Section 37 of the Act by issuing notice dated 12. 1. 1999. One notice was addressed to the President and the Member, petitioner No. 1 and the second notice of the same date was served on other petit






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top