Y.B.BHATT
GOPISHANKAR S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) ). THIS is an application under Sec. 482 of the Criminal procedure Code at the instance of the original accused Nos. 4 to 7 for quashing the proceedings in Criminal Case No. 4498 of 1998, initiated under the complaint of respondent No. 2-original complainant who is the Food Inspector, Western railway, Ahmedabad.
( 2 ) THE said complainant filed a complaint in respect of offences punishable under Sec. 7 (ii) read with Sec. 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration act, 1954, in respect of a food item produced by the Limited Company (accusedno. 8)
( 3 ) ). The contentions raised in the present application are two-fold, and therefore, it would be simpler to deal with applicant Nos. 1 and 2 (accused nos. 4 and 5) on the one hand and applicant Nos. 3 and 4 (accused Nos. 6 and 7) on the other.
( 4 ) ). So far as the applicant Nos. 3 and 4 (accused Nos. 6 and 7) are concerned, the complainant refers to them in the complaint as "partners". It is well established that the accused No. 8 which is the manufacturer of the food item in question is a public limited company, and that there cannot be any partners in a public limited company. Even if we assume that the complainan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.