SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 480

B.C.PATEL, P.B.MAJMUDAR
JAYANTIGAR S. GOSAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, D.P.Joshi, J.T.TRIVEDI, R.K.MISHRA, SUMAN KHARE

B. C. PATEL, P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER, making a grievance that there is a denial of grade of trained teachers as per Desai Pay Commission recommendations, has approached this Court by filing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner is also contending that grade of untrained teacher on the ground that the teacher is not trained is against the constitutional mandate of "equal pay for equal work", and is discriminatory.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has stated that he is possessing higher qualifications, viz. , B. A. and G. B. T. C. According to the petitioner, G. B. T. C. is a qualification prescribed for imparting training to P. T. C. students. The P. T. C. students after qualifying are considered as trained teachers for imparting education to students attending primary schools. Before the learned single Judge, at the time of hearing on 2. 5. 1998, it was contended that several Judges of this Court have taken a view that the qualification of B. A. , B. Ed. is higher than that of P. T. C. and the teachers, possessing such qualifications, cannot be treated as untrained primary teachers. The Government relaxed the condition in respect of primary teachers a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top